tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20304931019494616372024-03-06T11:06:56.593+05:30The Management BlogUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger33125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-32690105052181565752014-04-14T23:23:00.001+05:302014-04-14T23:30:32.298+05:30Practice more important than formal courses<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Last week I gave a week long 'Public Speaking' course to secondary level students in a summer camp. The way I'd conduct the session would be to give a short introduction about the area we were focusing that day - for example: organization, body language or vocal variety - and then spend the rest of the class for practice through various activities. At the end of the five days I don't know if anybody became a better speaker. It might have been the first time few students were ever speaking in front of people. Yet I don't think anyone gained much from the short course. I say so because I know through experience that there are only three rules for becoming a better public speaker and that is "Practice. Practice. Practice."<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I didn't become an effective public speaker or a good writer by taking a course or studying techniques. In fact, I don't have any formal training or qualification in these areas. What made me good was years of practice. I started speaking in front of public ever since I was in kindergarten. In fact, I loved it. I started writing somewhere around the same time. It was many years before I realized I was any good at it. So there comes a time when you actually begin to notice that you're actually good at something and you wish to take it to the next level. To do this, I've found a common group that meets regularly and has mentors to guide us as being the best option.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I've grown in manifolds as a public speaker ever since joining the Toastmasters' club. The club doesn't teach me the techniques of public speaking. Rather it is a platform where I can actually go on stage and speak. Every week I meet with a group of people with a common purpose - get better at public speaking. There are evaluators and mentors who help me find out my weak areas. I also get to learn my strong points. Thus, I believe that the best way for anyone to get better at any skill is not just to take a course but carry on regular practice most preferably in a group that meets regularly. However, a course could be the starting point that imparts us the basic techniques to get started. But the skill is learnt only through repeated experience and practice.<br />
<br />
So if you want to be a better public speaker, join the Toastmasters' Club. If you want to be a better writer, start a blog. If you want to be a good artist, start making art. And in this process, always make sure that you get feedback and have good mentors to guide you. A course really doesn't change your skill. But a dedicated practice certainly does!</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-70962654921269419582013-11-15T10:44:00.000+05:302013-11-15T10:44:14.329+05:30Ego - a source of conflict<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
I am not an expert in conflict resolution. Yet I know one thing about conflict to be true - many times the source of it lies in the 'ego'.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-2lCa4zcnILm6amRRZwrn_t2WjEXQAnvPdndlIOOLgRGeP2miTs8KLTwPigd_cdS1VpCs1RP5MDU6dsVvTC6L3Llh366wxU02cf6IrZlrd6bN4-ZKP7ho5p8fTan2GOWnl0SWJKR1eBmL/s1600/conflict.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="230" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj-2lCa4zcnILm6amRRZwrn_t2WjEXQAnvPdndlIOOLgRGeP2miTs8KLTwPigd_cdS1VpCs1RP5MDU6dsVvTC6L3Llh366wxU02cf6IrZlrd6bN4-ZKP7ho5p8fTan2GOWnl0SWJKR1eBmL/s320/conflict.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Sometimes why does a manager resent a very hard-working and capable employee? The answer - <i>"They did not act as I said or they did not do what I asked them to do."</i> More than a case of discipline or the work not being done, it becomes a case of gratifying one's ego. <i>"How can someone dare to disobey me",</i> right? The same holds true for the employees. Instead of gracefully accepting a constructive criticism or feedback, they start contemplating that fact that the 'I' was criticized.<br />
<br />
It is important for each person to have a sense of self-respect. There will be times when we have to choose to walk away or fight the fight. But a lot of conflict occurs because the two people in the conflict are too convinced about being right and too offended to hear anything said against the 'I'. Neither party is ready to compromise because the 'I' becomes more important than the issue at hand. Whether or not the problem gets solved 'I' should not be offended.<br />
<br />
I believe that if people learn to move out from this obsession with the 'I' and focus on the problem or issue at hand instead, reaching a solution and avoiding conflicts would be a lot easier.<br />
<br /></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-88675031782518672852013-11-04T23:54:00.000+05:302013-11-04T23:54:17.405+05:30Gratitude at workplace<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEga4yd47dSXuY-SK_sgSzu2CCGzlRYKEu4ORINFMi0peRwDTZhbtI6nlKoule4SQvJfHUL2QiUQhLCjPzsg4BbhqddAsiTKSwq9SzDkNh8WyJNgTe2uz6Yy-2N31xt4KkJlbGbdMRVv3dZJ/s1600/gratitude-thoughts-02+(1).jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="270" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEga4yd47dSXuY-SK_sgSzu2CCGzlRYKEu4ORINFMi0peRwDTZhbtI6nlKoule4SQvJfHUL2QiUQhLCjPzsg4BbhqddAsiTKSwq9SzDkNh8WyJNgTe2uz6Yy-2N31xt4KkJlbGbdMRVv3dZJ/s320/gratitude-thoughts-02+(1).jpg" width="320" /></a>Do you have any idea what a job may mean for a person? It is taking care of a family, sending kids to school, being independent, buying that lovely dress you see in the mall, eating your favorite meal, paying rent and staying warm in winter. Yet most of the time all that a job gets is complaint - <i>"This is not enough, that is not enough and blah blah... "</i> - rather than gratitude.<br />
<br />
Do you have any idea what someone working for you means? That person is making the functioning of a business possible. With his help your business, which is probably your dream, is moving ahead. The employees are giving their time, effort, attention for a dream that is yours. Yet an employee is treated with anything but gratitude - <i>"I'm paying him so he better do as I ask him to do"</i>.<br />
<br />
What happens in the larger context of events is that getting a job and giving a job is following a divine order. Each of us are neither selling ourselves nor doing any favor for each other. In the course of helping ourselves we're helping the other person as well. And this deserves gratitude.<br />
<br />
What happens if employees start feeling grateful towards their employers for giving them a job? What if employers start feeling grateful towards their employees for making the functioning of business possible? Something amazing - we would be happier and so would the workplace. And since 'gratitude' is such a positive emotion, our lives would only get better and more prosperous.</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-37174437179848649762013-10-23T20:32:00.000+05:302013-10-23T20:32:01.079+05:30Performance vs. Character<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Someone close to me recently told
me that her boss called her for a one-on-one meeting and told her, <i>“From the time I’ve know you, you are
someone who tries to please everyone. That does not work in real life. I
expected you to change as a person but you haven’t. Please change that in you.”</i>
She was shocked by this comment and asked, <i>“In
what context are you saying this to me?”</i> Her boss stayed mum. As far as her
performance at work was concerned, nothing much was discussed. She expressed
her dissatisfaction with me. I asked, <i>“What
gives your manager a right to comment upon your character? Isn’t it his job to
help you with your performance instead?”<o:p></o:p></i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<i><br /></i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
As a member of Toastmasters and
as an evaluator of speeches, I’ve learnt that as an evaluator (which is also a
part of being a leader) our job is to comment on the speeches and not the
speaker. Thus, as a manager, I believe it is his or her responsibility to
comment on our performance and not our character.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
I would much appreciate my own boss
if he gives me suggestion related to my work performance rather than suggestion
related to how I should or should not be. I cannot change who I am for the sake
of a job nor can anybody else. As managers and leaders, the responsibility of
each person is to help others in improving their performance and changing them
as a person. Perhaps as a mentor, one can drop few words of wisdom but no one
has the rights to tell anyone <i>“This is
who you ought to be”.</i> </div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-82256427994589588252013-10-23T20:28:00.000+05:302013-10-23T20:28:29.195+05:30Telecommuting as a tool for productivity<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
The world has grown into a global
village now. Thanks to computers and internet. But it’s not just our loved ones
that the internet has been able to connect. It’s even the workers in
organizations. Yet the benefits of this technology are not being utilized for
purposes other than posting photos in Facebook. With the advent of the computer
generation, change in work schedules and organizational structure has been
possible. Yet at this part of the world, I don’t see these changes being
adapted.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
I work at an organization where
one of my key works involves designing courses to be taught to school children.
Now this work involves some thinking, some internet research and some book and
article references. For this, I don’t need to be present at my workplace. I can
do the work at home and submit the output with the click of a mouse. How much
time does working from home save me? Two hours at least! These two hours is
just the time for commute. There is also added time I need for rest due to the
physical exhaustion I have to experience as a result of being a part of packed
buses and be stuck for hours in traffic jams. Yet my workplace would consider
me as working only if I am present at the workplace during office hours. What
matters is that I remain within the office (even if I spend time in gossip) and
not that I produce something worthwhile at my own time. Where are we heading
with this mentality? Nowhere, I suppose because the focus is on whether the
employees are giving their time to the organization or not for the salary they
are paid each month. Zero focus is placed on productivity or output.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
I know the justification for this
could be the matter of trust of whether employees would honestly work from home
or not. But if the work is made deadline based and result-oriented, then why
does it matter at what time the employees work and at what time they choose to
rest?</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
I believe that organizations need
to trust their employees and make them more driven by focusing on results. I
don’t think <i>“The employees must give their time for the organization, even if
they are idle, because we are paying them”</i> is a positive attitude in part of
organizations. Why not buy results or outputs from employees rather than their
time? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
There are jobs like that of
administration, customer service or accounting that requires employees to
remain at their work desk. That’s fine. But there are other kinds of work that
may or may not require the employee to be within the periphery of the office
all the time. And if social interactions are required, then what about a weekly
get-together? </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
As an aid, why not make telecommuting
a new basis of work design if the work is such that it can be performed from
home? This way an organization is not just buying output but also granting the
employees freedom to use their time at their will and showing trust upon their
work commitments and capabilities.</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfw-ngsJN_2KkuexLzX_rBTHQ0Tl7Ss4J0IDM3NnIWzqpwb70kR5WE0O1GoIJpAMV-yrW0BOmn3OGbPHWDT5b5Njlw9epxrYO2NJDw_xua7Tnn2TaiuwVbN30dUGja-I-P2CQtdHy6Neeq/s1600/telecommute-pic-2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="164" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfw-ngsJN_2KkuexLzX_rBTHQ0Tl7Ss4J0IDM3NnIWzqpwb70kR5WE0O1GoIJpAMV-yrW0BOmn3OGbPHWDT5b5Njlw9epxrYO2NJDw_xua7Tnn2TaiuwVbN30dUGja-I-P2CQtdHy6Neeq/s320/telecommute-pic-2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjST6Oct9pNTFtUcw4vyW7RuJ9A6JazhWLOC7HX-JpashI95krlE4lG71Svzqt9byMGpy3HgBvvkWUen06x0uBk51Z_PgGgTeR8tS5-CqPPLVEONNpuC5gMjptAzk4H-2MUVDhsSj-yWcEe/s1600/perks_of_telecommuting-figure.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="246" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjST6Oct9pNTFtUcw4vyW7RuJ9A6JazhWLOC7HX-JpashI95krlE4lG71Svzqt9byMGpy3HgBvvkWUen06x0uBk51Z_PgGgTeR8tS5-CqPPLVEONNpuC5gMjptAzk4H-2MUVDhsSj-yWcEe/s320/perks_of_telecommuting-figure.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-63247110965509452732013-10-01T15:28:00.000+05:302013-10-21T15:31:35.305+05:30Complain culture<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Complaining has become a culture at our workplaces. But have we ever asked ourselves this question - what function does complain accomplish? Now complain can help in identifying or solving a problem. Complaints point out the weak areas management can focus on improving. But complaints can also be a way of exacerbating the intensity of our current problems. It is because when more people talk about what's dissatisfying, the problems occur to be bigger than they really are. In some cases, the complaint may not even be a problem in the first place. Yet the continuous discussion of what's not right makes a small glitch appear like a big devil.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyWGJtUmWxLQw7w9iISiECJHAkwyRbrvANTWz0i8r_hKxhURRLl1Qe5A_3511JJcN1QbzLqFLRnmbSi4zohyV-LSakqE_Tei1pzOwtojp7rT7CPqq4P2ya62Po29Ecn8THVSfiWa1gyWx8/s1600/complaints.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="303" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyWGJtUmWxLQw7w9iISiECJHAkwyRbrvANTWz0i8r_hKxhURRLl1Qe5A_3511JJcN1QbzLqFLRnmbSi4zohyV-LSakqE_Tei1pzOwtojp7rT7CPqq4P2ya62Po29Ecn8THVSfiWa1gyWx8/s320/complaints.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<br />
Shiv Khera wrote in his book 'You can Win': <i>"When you complain, 50% people don't care and 50% people are happy that you're dissatisfied, so why complain?" </i>So honestly, complaining breeds no solution or results. What about being grateful instead? And, if there's nothing to be grateful about then, let us remember the Serenity Prayer:<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>"God grant me the serenity</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>to accept the things I cannot change;</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>The courage to change</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>to change the ones I can;</i></div>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<i>and the wisdom to know the difference."</i></div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
When each person starts to apply this prayer in his or her life, complaints will certainly stop. Can I do something about what I'm complaining about? If the answer is 'yes' - then lets do it! If the answer is 'no', then lets learn to accept it. But here's also a third way out - if you can't change and if you can't accept, then quit. Why worry yourself and worry others with your constant complaints?</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I believe that if we can shift from this 'complain culture' to 'solution culture', we are walking the path of progress. It's better to spend time finding solutions rather than complaining. But as long as we continue to complain and not do anything about it, we're stuck in a quicksand. It would really help if most of us remembered the serenity prayer. Perhaps the extra time spent in complaining can be devoted to the practice of developing 'serenity' and 'courage' in each of us.</div>
<br /></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-88743806139619653032013-08-13T13:58:00.000+05:302013-08-13T13:58:24.028+05:30Rat race - where did it all start?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioZWOsGND9vjyK4ZJQc9BPtNI5wuhdka_kw-kWdbsjEVdLH1pf6waPNXRQbYrlNqRBs7TBjIzlXWhxwAEeCNTwf3rb2ScfXHznqBVjVs-a5nr4inGReXvQBiP75m6KCTwjDtXaUAM6UrX1/s1600/rat-race.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioZWOsGND9vjyK4ZJQc9BPtNI5wuhdka_kw-kWdbsjEVdLH1pf6waPNXRQbYrlNqRBs7TBjIzlXWhxwAEeCNTwf3rb2ScfXHznqBVjVs-a5nr4inGReXvQBiP75m6KCTwjDtXaUAM6UrX1/s320/rat-race.gif" width="276" /></a>Leg-pulling, back-stabbing and the rat race is prevalent and persistent in corporate culture. Manipulations and politicking to get ahead never stops. Soon after people enter the work life, they start reminiscing their childhood days in school or college. But my question has always been, <i>"Where did this rat race start in the first place?</i>" I found my answer today.<br />
<br />
As I was conducting the 'Life Skills' class encouraging students to compete only with themselves, the coordinator madam entered the class. She picked one student and said,<i> "Alice, you used to come in the 10th position and now you're 11th. Are you going to win next time? Are you going to let anyone overtake you?"</i> Then she picked another one and said, <i>"Alex, are you going to let anyone win you? You're going to be better than everyone else, right?"</i> The kids nodded their head in agreement and I could see how desperate they were to get ahead of others and be better in relation to other classmates just to please the authority figures including the parents and teachers. That's when it struck me. This culture of rat race begins right from the roots of education.<br />
<br />
Competition is a good thing as long as it inspires and encourages you to improve and excel than your previous self. But the way of motivating kids or motivating anyone as such has been through making them compete with someone else. A child who learns in his more than 10-15 years of schooling to compete and win others is definitely going to do the same thing when he enters his work life. Kids are simply not taught the value of co-operation and helping one another. It's not enough to teach 'Moral Science' when the basic form of judging the kids is based on their ranking on examination or how well they have performed in comparison to the next kid.<br />
<br />
In one of the Toastmasters' meeting, an experienced Toastmaster said, <i><b>"Toastmaster is not about competing with anybody else but competing with yourself. It is about improving your previous speech and becoming a better speaker yourself. You compete only with yourself."</b></i> I also remember the lines from the sunscreen song, <i><b>"Sometimes you're ahead, sometimes you're behind. The race is long and at the end it's only with yourself." </b></i>But when will the educators and administrators learn about this? When will the kids learn about this? And as long as the kids don't understand the importance of competing only with oneself and the worthlessness and irrelevance of competing with others, how can we expect the workplace to be any different? We might enter a workplace and long for the good old days with friends without understanding that what we long for was the very place where the feeling of competition and the desperate urge to win was inculcated in our basic drive and instinct.<br />
<br /></div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-74347638670482989972013-08-12T16:51:00.000+05:302013-08-12T16:51:05.648+05:30Plan vs. Implementation<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQceJSRrLSg2Y_6UuuwqLtixnHbSOS6-Q_RkkNreUH9CpLDwksHs9OIvpXPBRbmnxpRuB7AIJLr-oNDBCOkKz-q-W7ntMwWvdXvgfRT80LXE_gqkLv5di91v1878qH5WUE98IswmGmLPsP/s1600/sbpuzzled-300x276.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQceJSRrLSg2Y_6UuuwqLtixnHbSOS6-Q_RkkNreUH9CpLDwksHs9OIvpXPBRbmnxpRuB7AIJLr-oNDBCOkKz-q-W7ntMwWvdXvgfRT80LXE_gqkLv5di91v1878qH5WUE98IswmGmLPsP/s1600/sbpuzzled-300x276.jpg" /></a>My college is planning to
implement a new set of procedures for the management program once again. It’s
probably the third time that they have changed their way of teaching students.
More class room participation, student-centered and web-based activities and
thought-provoking session among students are encouraged. The intention of doing
all this is good. In case of an effective implementation of this plan, the
results would bring very remarkable results. More proactive students and
critical and creative thinkers can be produced through this program. But the
question is – will this program be effective? I can find myself nodding my head
in a ‘No’ not because I don’t trust the plan but because I don’t trust the
implementation process.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
First, this plan does not consider the limitations of the inputs or change agents (in this case, the teachers). The new way of teaching
demands the teachers to be more creative and flexible. In a two-hour period, it
is the responsibility of the teachers to make the class interesting by not just
focusing on the lectures but also making the subject more participative and
interesting. It can be through the introduction of games, use of stories or audio-visual
materials. But not all teachers who are the masters of a particular subject know how to be creative with the delivery. Aren’t we the
ones who learnt in the old ways of teaching? So how can someone expect the
teachers to suddenly come up with new alarming techniques to hold the fleeting attention of students?
While much is being expected from the teachers, effort is not being put into
the training and development of those concerned ones who will actually play a
major role in the delivery and success of the plan. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Second, this plan does not consider the basic characteristics and preference of the recipients of output. For example, I know I should be reading extra books to acquire more knowledge that will help me succeed in my career. Instead, my natural instinct prefers to go out on a movie with a group of friends. There is always a gap between what we want to do and what we ought to do. Considering the age of students majority of them will prefer to do what they want to do rather than what they ought to do. This does not mean they are bad students. It's just that human brains are wired to seek for pleasure and instant gratification. The program focuses too much on what the students ought to do - read more books, do more field visits, engage in more thought-provoking discussions and give more presentations. But what about what the majority of students want to do? Thus, telling them plainly that getting better grades will help you become more successful in life is just not done. What can be the innovative ways to motivate the students to actually work out of their love for doing what they're doing rather than as an obligation to fulfill the college requirement? It is because as long as the attitude of the students are not changed rules are not going to help in bringing real change at all. To attain the intended results one must think creatively to motivate the students. Of course, trust is essential. We trust the students to do their best. But then, it's human nature to find an easy way out. How could the same program be designed in such a way to make the students more excited about and committed towards it?</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Third, the motivation part of the change agents are completely ignored. Not every teacher is a social worker who wants to make a big difference in the lives of students. Most are teaching for the sake of earning a living. A lot is expected out of
the teachers. If a student is not original, then make him/her repeat his work
and presentation. But at what cost? Doesn’t repetition mean additional burden
not just for the students but also for the teachers? As a part-time teacher,
why should I come on a Saturday to re-evaluate uninterested students at my own
time and expense? Of course, I want to make a difference in the lives of people
and do a good job. But not this way, not here. I would give my time and attention
to the ones willing to learn but definitely not waste my effort coaxing an
uninterested student. So where is the monetary motivation that would inspire
me or any other teacher to give extra effort? I'm just thinking this from the perspective of an economist. Wouldn’t I rather go to an oldage
home or an orphanage where the recipient of my service is much happier by my
presence instead of the student who resents me making him/her repeat his/her project?</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
Every great project starts with a great plan, a vision. But in order to achieve the vision one needs to take proper steps and use the right techniques to get there. I have full respect and support for the plan my college management has come up with. However, it fails to consider the characteristics and capabilities of the inputs. It fails to consider basic human psychology and the factors regarding motivation. Any plan cannot be executed unless the tools of execution are in right order and right place. Also people seem to totally ignore that it is humans who make all the difference. I wish the plans of my college management would succeed. But before that wish comes true, I'm yet to see people understanding the importance of developing and motivating the change agents who actually help in making the plans turn into a reality.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-1552951503609038972012-09-29T09:22:00.000+05:302012-09-29T09:30:37.778+05:30What 'professionalism' means for me<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The word 'professionalism' means two things for me - delivering what we promise and keeping our personal biases aside. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Delivering what we promise</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
We need not be an expert. We might not even be the best in the field. But if we say we're going to deliver a certain product or service at a certain time and certain date, then we have to do it. That's delivering what we promise. Sometimes we may not be able deliver due to uncontrollable circumstances. In this case, proper communication about the delay is important. At times we might end up making errors. Accepting our mistakes and making improvements makes a big difference. When we take responsibility and deliver what we have promised we'll deliver, we're being a professional.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Keeping our personal biases aside</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
A person who is very good at his work may not get along well when it comes to personal relationships. We might have to work with someone with whom we have had some personal conflicts in the past. Sometimes ego clash may come in between work. But keeping all of this aside, work has to be aimed towards achieving a specific result or common goal. When a manager does a performance appraisal, he needs to look at the work and not his personal relationship with his sub-ordinate. If we are able to have an objective look at a person's work by keeping all the personal affairs aside, we're being a professional.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If we deliver what we promise but are involved in personal bias with our team members at work, then we're not professional. Similarly we may be very fair and just but if we fail to deliver what we promise then we're not being a professional either. Only the right blend of delivering promises and being fair produces the delightful taste of 'professionalism'. </div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-87966885252812743612012-08-11T10:03:00.003+05:302012-08-11T10:03:51.477+05:30What kind of work you want to do?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Consider the following two scenarios:</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Scenario 1: </i>You have a work that enriches you and fulfills you internally. Your senior is not your boss but your mentor. He believes in you and your ability to do any task assigned. Even when you make mistakes or sometimes dodge deadlines, he doesn't make an issue out of it but tries to understand what has been bothering you. He has his complete faith in you and every time tells you 'you can' even when you're not doing your work as per his expectations. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<i>Scenario 2: </i>You have a work that drains you from the inside. Your senior is a dictator. He constantly doubts your ability to do the work assigned to you. When you make an error, he gives this mocking smile and says "I knew you couldn't do it all right". He expects you to be a machine rather than a human. Even when you do the best of your work, all that anyone notices are the mistakes you've made and not the good work you have done.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Now it is quite evident what scenario anyone wants to be in. Everyone likes scenario one and no one likes scenario two. If you're in scenario 1, you're happy, motivated and loyal. On the other hand, scenario 2 means unhappiness, frustration and ultimately doubting your own capabilities. There are always professions we choose and we have this constant pressure and need of making a career for ourselves. But I believe before career comes happiness. Being happy means choosing scenario 1. The work may not add much to your career but it will surely add a great deal to your happiness and state of self-esteem. But if you're in scenario 2 then even if the job pays well and is a stepping stone for a brighter life ahead, as long as you're stuck there you're losing your happiness and draining yourself from your self-esteem.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
However, there's no way of figuring out before you start any work whether you're joining scenario 1 or scenario 2. If by some bad misfortune, you're stuck in scenario 2 then perhaps that's a test in your life. One must learn to be patient and tolerate. There is much to learn from that kind of experience too. If you can handle that, you can handle anything in the world. But then there comes a time when integrity and a sense of peace and self-respect takes precedence over career. One must know when that time has come. Until then lets just survive the test and carry on.</div>
</div>
Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-1944127932784250732012-08-10T07:27:00.000+05:302012-08-10T07:27:46.534+05:30What is a team?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwap1h0LK8HsfowfnB8Yg4iThHOYgabgGSiT_6qluOk0g5OAaYhShemcVWjSmI1DMeranZ1abLNgPzOk9QbTT_1Fqcf6Bmny9Gnyh0BGbYeOZUhOribBxJkZPpDSrVfwUZzJJj-IOWK6V5/s1600/teams.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgwap1h0LK8HsfowfnB8Yg4iThHOYgabgGSiT_6qluOk0g5OAaYhShemcVWjSmI1DMeranZ1abLNgPzOk9QbTT_1Fqcf6Bmny9Gnyh0BGbYeOZUhOribBxJkZPpDSrVfwUZzJJj-IOWK6V5/s1600/teams.jpg" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
What is a team? Is it a team if a group of people are working for the same business of an organization? Is it a team if the corporate hierarchy dictates people to work together in the same working space? The name 'team' itself has a positive vibe attached to it. Therefore, if a group of people working together for the same purpose do not respect and value each other, it is not a proper team. Similarly, instead of supporting each other, if a few members of the team are conspiring against one person then it's not a team either. A good team has proper communication within the team. They help one another in times of need. If one member is facing a hard time, the others come for help and support rather than abandoning that member. There is mutual trust and cohesion within a team. If that is not the case, then we should not call that group of people a team in the first place.</div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-10121359012685662582012-06-23T13:03:00.000+05:302012-06-23T16:10:00.966+05:30My Work-Life Insights<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If you've noticed I've changed the title of my blog. 'The Management Blog' didn't really seem suitable considering the contents I've been putting into this space. 'My Work-life Insights' is more like it as it's exactly what I do in here.</div>
<br />
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>The story behind this blog</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
It all started some 7-8 months ago. I was working in an organization with a lot of potential in the field of research but it didn't have a proper management. They wanted me to contribute in establishing a 'system' but nobody really cared on acting upon it. I encountered unprofessional people along the way. I had so much to offer but I was upset in my inability to bring a change as nobody cared to include me in the so-called 'system-setting' process and nobody cared to change their acts and behavior in order to make the organization what they wanted it to be. Nevertheless, they kept praising my work and wanted me to stay. During this phase I felt a lot of negativity settling inside me. Thus, I decided to give it a creative turn. Instead of complaining about what's not right and letting my ideas vanish in thin air where no one gave a heed upon it I started writing it as a part of my blog.<br />
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>The story now</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I stopped working full-time in that organization back in December 2011. I continued helping them part-time for the next five months. Now I've been working in a different set of organizational setting. It's an organization I'd worked for previously and I will never hesitate admiring it for its set of systems. However, when I returned in the same place 2 years later I found everything changed. Life's more difficult, work's more difficult, people are most difficult to deal with. Once again, I'm using the same platform to channel my creative energies. 'My Work Life Insights', thus, is about work-life experiences and my reflection upon it. To be clear, it's nothing personal. It's all about the lessons I learn along the way.<br />
<br /></div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-37229052488508234362012-06-04T21:09:00.000+05:302012-06-04T21:09:18.648+05:30The best way!<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
He says his way is the only way. She says her way is the only way. They say their way is the only way. But, instead of focusing on 'my way' why not focus on 'the best way' of doing things? After all, there is a lot we can learn from every person. Why not discuss things out with an open mind? Why not focus on the issue at hand instead of personal ego? There is no right or a wrong way. We can always find a best way by combining all possible solutions. It's a good thing to believe in oneself and have a deep conviction in one's own ideas. However, sometimes the ideal solution can be reached only through learning, sharing and discussion. Relevant and applicable points can be picked from his way, her way and their way and a best way can be found.</div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-87913013640600932752012-06-01T08:07:00.000+05:302012-06-01T08:07:49.600+05:30Being a manager...<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLsohF7lfagPkc4f3gAyQIeXiwk-2pX8sEiYyM3niHafkWB3l_JrGY5239crq30WS2e2bklZmm3n8fj1cUrzHMH0mGVGuaHscjk4Tvtj8-bcMqufk6yWZ1Lip5hYMq4s0ivolNb1SXouIk/s1600/ModernManagers+1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="251" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLsohF7lfagPkc4f3gAyQIeXiwk-2pX8sEiYyM3niHafkWB3l_JrGY5239crq30WS2e2bklZmm3n8fj1cUrzHMH0mGVGuaHscjk4Tvtj8-bcMqufk6yWZ1Lip5hYMq4s0ivolNb1SXouIk/s320/ModernManagers+1.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
They say, "MBA is for managers." And, thus, fresh graduates enroll into an MBA and expect to be managers as soon as they get a degree. At other times, we have people with years of experience assuming the role of a manager. But, being a manager isn't just about having a fancy degree and years of experience. It isn't also just about signing documents, authorizing actions and attending meetings. Being a manager extends far beyond all these external elements. Being a manager entails that you be fair, just and responsible. As a manager, you have to ensure that you treat all your subordinates equally. In the same way, if you have to stand up for the ones you're managing then you will have to do that. You've got to be just. You also cannot shift over all your responsibilities to your subordinates and let them take the final blame. You need to be able to have their back. As a manager, you also have to be concerned about the learning and development of the people you're managing. You're supposed to be a motivator. If someone is not doing a good job, then it is the manager's responsibility to find out the reasons and take necessary and positive actions. If someone is working well, then one has to ensure that person is acknowledged and rewarded. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
The job of a manager is not easy. You have to leave control but also have to take charge of so many things. You have to be firm yet flexible. You need to be proactive and patient. You have to be able to trust your own judgments. You've got to be a learner and also a guide. First time managers may fail in many respects but one must never stop trying. But, most of the times it is often the experienced ones who forget about all the necessary elements of being a manager and are only focused on power and prestige. Education and experience are both very important elements of a manager. But, along with it character and attitude plays the biggest role in determining whether the manager is a good one or bad.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-26756977898270741202012-05-30T09:45:00.000+05:302012-05-30T20:58:41.982+05:30Work life & Meditation<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOSKafbAXu6hF_HMfVyaKWO1WbJ4YVgYHylJEU5n2a0NGRoqlL8fAHhxxh2pXyIZBNwblNVcBdnrfA00pO-p9mELVV1oYOTzIch_8uGMv2mz1DaRgPw6ttLkdWc7HkrVmTToHqgKv5SdPH/s1600/yoga_lady_clipart-273x300.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgOSKafbAXu6hF_HMfVyaKWO1WbJ4YVgYHylJEU5n2a0NGRoqlL8fAHhxxh2pXyIZBNwblNVcBdnrfA00pO-p9mELVV1oYOTzIch_8uGMv2mz1DaRgPw6ttLkdWc7HkrVmTToHqgKv5SdPH/s200/yoga_lady_clipart-273x300.gif" width="179" /></a>Every time I went for a meditation camp few acquaintances and relatives of mine would ask me if I was planning to become a nun. No, I was not! I was intending to become a professional. Meditation taught me to be non-judgmental and non-reactive. Whether it was a good sensation or bad I had to let it pass. I also learnt the importance of silence through meditation. The same techniques can be applied to survive in a professional world. Whether it be praise or criticism we have to learn how to let it pass. Just because someone is too good to us doesn't mean we can trust them. Evil intentions are usually disguised in the veil of politeness. Similarly, just because someone condemns us doesn't mean we have a reason to doubt ourselves. If the criticism is justified, then we've got to use our wisdom to make needed improvements. On the other hand, if the criticism is baseless, then we have to learn how to ignore it. Silence also becomes very necessary in professional dealings. Many times the words we use can be used against us. Vipassana advocates noble silence whereby no communication is possible even through gestures and body language. Having a blank expression where no other person can guess what's running through your mind is also crucial at work. This is important for two reasons - first, one must separate work and emotions and second, because it helps us keep a safe distance from people who are experts at manipulation. </div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Work life entails a lot of pressure and stress. There are many chances of emotional fluctuation. One time you're elated and at other times you're down in distress. Learning how to deal with such highs and lows and keeping a stable balance guarantees a mentally healthy life. We also gain extra strength and stability for dealing with difficult situations. Having a calm personality and being a person who's fair and competent is the mark of a true professional. The only way I can think of how to get to that mark is by applying the techniques of meditation. So, the next time I sit to meditate - it's not just because I am looking for a spiritually fulfilled life, it's also because I'm looking forward to be a mentally healthy professional.</div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-60049489121252260882012-05-29T12:29:00.001+05:302012-05-29T12:34:31.219+05:30Feedback - what does it say?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
When you're new in any organization, the first few months is the time for learning. During this phase you'd expect your colleagues to co-operate and your seniors to guide you. You're also likely to make some mistakes. Perhaps you end up doing things differently than it's usually done. You will need someone to outline the system and process for you. If I do a certain process differently, it doesn't mean I think I'm better than everyone else and I'm trying to implement my own system. It only means that I haven't understood the system yet and I want someone to show me the right way. However, few managers tend to think the other way round. This morning I made a simple mistake of numbering in a slightly different manner than it's usually done. I wasn't trying to change the system or prove my ways are better. I just didn't know and I had too much work to notice the minor slip. The feedback I got, <i>"Do you think your ways are better than my system and everyone else who worked here before you? If you think that way then you've got to prove it to me and I can assure you, you can't." </i>The same person once told me, <i>"I don't want you to do the easy way. I want you to do things my way." </i>Now when I think of the constant feedback I keep getting from this person, I realize the feedback speaks less about me and more about him. Apparently, I don't mind! That's what work life is all about. A lot of people see their own reflection and perception in you. You gotta learn to keep an open mind and open ears whereby you listen everything, ignore most of it and retain a few points that help you learn and grow.</div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-71967224845592561972012-05-27T11:50:00.001+05:302012-05-27T11:50:41.465+05:30Bad examples<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
If a high ranking official talks about fairness, integrity and professionalism but lets his personal ego and issues influence his professional decisions, then it's hard to follow the values and standards he sets. If the same official favors and appreciates even the mistakes of a mendacious worker while condemning the efforts of the conscientious one, then its easy to question his intentions. When that same person changes business partners and makes employees overwork but underpays in the name of cost-saving yet refuses to let go of the perks and allowances granted to him, then its obvious to eye him as corrupt. Big talks doesn't make anyone appear big in the eyes of others. The work one does and the behavior one exhibits follows like a shadow. If the intention of a manager or someone in a higher authority role is to motivate and influence their co-workers and subordinates, big talks don't serve the purpose. What truly determines the character and commitment level of a professional is the work and not the words. Sadly too many hypocrites exist and we have to learn to deal with them. Sad but true - professionalism demands we keep a straight face despite the disgust. We simply learn to carry on with our work responsibilities without placing any degree of trust and respect for those who manage us in the name of corporate hierarchy. They are the unfortunate bad examples in the name of leadership. We despise them but the best we can do is try never to be like them and stay alert for though we're good, we all have to learn how to save our a**.</div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-36580175533898493732012-05-08T21:41:00.000+05:302012-05-08T21:45:56.176+05:30Management Styles<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I'd always been the kind of person who've believed in motivating a person through love. I regarded fear motivation as a wrong practice. Appreciation and kindness seemed to me the best way to get work done through people. Democracy and freedom in work was important. But, lately a few instances where I've had the responsibility to manage has made me think differently. How you motivate and manage largely depends upon the kind of people you're dealing with. If it's proactive subordinates or team members who take their work seriously, are dedicated, willing to learn and understand what is expected of them then appreciation and democracy works the best. However, if you're dealing with people who're incompetent yet exhibit an atmosphere of overconfidence, take no initiative to learn, have no respect for authority and constantly makes mistakes that put you in a difficult position then direction, strictness and some degree of fear motivation becomes necessary.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
Administering activities and managing a group of people is a difficult job. We cannot say one model works better than the other one. Whether you become a democratic leader or an authoritarian one depends directly on the kind of people you're managing. On a personal level, it might be considered as changing colors but on a professional level it's being flexible and tactful. After all, one's responsibility as a chief administrator is getting the work done efficiently and up to the standards without any blunders and not pleasing people. The key rule here is to learn about the people you're going to manage and adjust your management style accordingly.</div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-15236250240940469852012-04-22T10:28:00.000+05:302012-04-22T10:28:23.209+05:30Change - Is it always necessary?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<i><span lang="EN-GB">“Nothing
is permanent except change.”</span></i><span lang="EN-GB"> Change as such is not
only inevitable but also necessary. Organizations like everything else keep
undergoing a continuous process of change. Whenever an old leader is replaced
by a new one or when an old management is replaced by a new one then change
becomes an apparent phenomenon. Obviously management philosophies and style
differ according to individuals in charge. However, when one is replacing someone
then there seems to be many instances of not just necessary but also needless changes.
Everybody has this inner need to make a difference and stand out. Bringing
drastic changes seem to be their way of standing out. Critically evaluating a
process or established procedure is important. However, looking for faults is
never a good practice. Critical analysis means making a list of the good and the
bad. If something already in place works then there is no need to make a
change. What about making an effort to sustain the ongoing process instead? If
there are some loopholes then one can work on preventing them. If there are
some problems in the existing process then one can work on resolving them.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">Standing out as a leader and making a mark
doesn’t consist only in bringing new changes. Not all changes are good.
Sometimes continuing on a established pattern would be a wiser choice to make.
At the end, the test of a leader isn’t only about what new he/she created but
also how he/she delivered the results. Rather than being a management that
believes in ‘change’, why not be a management that believes in a <b>‘shared vision’</b>
and <b>‘delivering results in the best way possible’</b>. The best way might not
always be a new way. Many times the old way with some minor improvements could
be the best way of achieving targets. For this to happen the leaders and the
body of management needs to keep their personal issues aside and look ahead
towards a common purpose of seeking an option that works best for the
organization. Yes, changes happen and one needs to learn how to initiate change
and adapt to them. But, is change always necessary? That’s a bigger question to
ask. Perhaps some new leaders and new management forget to focus on ‘what’s
working’ and are too keen on finding faults that the change they initiate ends
up being a bad change instead of a good one.</span></div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-69874219693569870782012-04-20T07:32:00.001+05:302012-04-20T07:53:21.835+05:30Rules or Results?<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu1yh0zHj7PdtFHwfLUeneqnhmPXyXyh-Umiwk4WnV1CG4Oibbz1dTIX4KPgbeMpUKfMGuGHeFoVO5X-92ihCCtuam90OzzFPZaa1o07eC-9vCh4WyKm6qdcnqtbngLFktYFD-p03YC65c/s1600/social-media-policy.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhu1yh0zHj7PdtFHwfLUeneqnhmPXyXyh-Umiwk4WnV1CG4Oibbz1dTIX4KPgbeMpUKfMGuGHeFoVO5X-92ihCCtuam90OzzFPZaa1o07eC-9vCh4WyKm6qdcnqtbngLFktYFD-p03YC65c/s200/social-media-policy.gif" width="162" /></a></div>
Recently there has been a lot of changes at my workplace. Restructuring and a new management has created a kind of chaos that has directly affected the quality of service it has been providing its customers. Besides the negative impact to the external customers there's also a lot of confusion and resistance among the internal staffs. While there are a lot of reasons that led to this situation, one of the key problems is that policies and procedures have become the center of focus more than the end results. Having a system is important in ensuring uniformity and fairness. However, at what cost have you established the system? Is following rules more important than delivering results? I've also noticed that binding employees in a set of rigid rules is a way of taking away the spirit of team work. Making every individual accountable for a specific set of work is a good idea but does it come at the cost of individuals ignoring the bigger picture? While some changes are good, some changes look like simply a way of exercising dominance. If it's an organization that believes in its vision and customer orientation more than anything, then why is it so stuck in paper work and rigid rules rather than the results? And, why are the rules and changes that was supposed to bring security and standardization causing inconvenience to the customers instead? Why is the value of mutuality being lost in the midst of all this change? I guess the ones who've brought by this rule-based need to ask themselves this question once: <i>"What are we training our staffs for - to make them leaders or docile followers? Are we teaching them about rules to oblige by or helping them understand the shared purpose based on an organization wide vision?" </i></div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-72665172618448933682012-02-01T20:34:00.000+05:302012-02-01T20:34:05.049+05:30Think before you speak!<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHKyr_zcvzh0rhcG5SjspInUIOx4O_mJpnTGMJDYOaRUUlObk16rrqpMTYURVmq_kZ1LN9smwu0T4tsIl1r3LwalzZEaSg9NpzZNUi4smrxyc9vup45eFq2wj7vvkRt3NMjBpZEsj-o9eq/s1600/think+and+speak.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="212" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgHKyr_zcvzh0rhcG5SjspInUIOx4O_mJpnTGMJDYOaRUUlObk16rrqpMTYURVmq_kZ1LN9smwu0T4tsIl1r3LwalzZEaSg9NpzZNUi4smrxyc9vup45eFq2wj7vvkRt3NMjBpZEsj-o9eq/s320/think+and+speak.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">John Mayor sang,
<b>“Say what you need to say.”</b> But, in
the context of an organization, you need to be careful before you say what you
need to say. You’ll have to consider:</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-align: justify;">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What you say.</li>
<li>Whether what you say is important or not.</li>
<li>When you say it.</li>
<li>To whom you say.</li>
<li>And, finally how you say it.</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">Everything you
speak about may not be all that important. Does a minor issue need to be voiced
out? Another important factor is timing. Perhaps you’re really freaked out
before undertaking a particular assignment. Should you voice out your fear at
the moment you’re afraid? Or should you wait until you’ve accomplished the
task. You could later tell your colleagues how afraid you really were. The next
important factor to consider is to whom you say. If you have a problem then normally
in an organization it’s the line manager. Voicing your concerns to every other
person is not the wisest thing to do. Finally, how you say what you have to say
makes a big difference. For example, if a person from another department asks
you for your help and you’re really busy then you can say, <i>“No, I’m busy. I won’t help.”</i> Or you can be more subtle and say, <i>“I’d love to help you but my buckets are
full. So, I’m really sorry I can’t help you this time.”<o:p></o:p></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">Being a
professional means you learn the correct way of saying the right thing at the
right time to the right person and in a right way.</span></div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-85115136251304629872012-01-25T18:05:00.000+05:302012-01-25T18:05:04.143+05:30Leading by Example<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgt1lpOPs0N9Gz6hQAGerDf05eRgJOd81v8OWLLfeZmoYZ3fmtk6uIylGXXbE5fGFV-fRC5TrJdTSOiKWtU6__OKTw8gqazCGy6REt19-IbFwQw_Cz2GMje6s_Q9CCq8lz8gvUgx6n3eLki/s1600/leadership.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="111" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgt1lpOPs0N9Gz6hQAGerDf05eRgJOd81v8OWLLfeZmoYZ3fmtk6uIylGXXbE5fGFV-fRC5TrJdTSOiKWtU6__OKTw8gqazCGy6REt19-IbFwQw_Cz2GMje6s_Q9CCq8lz8gvUgx6n3eLki/s200/leadership.jpg" width="200" /></a><span lang="EN-GB">As managers and
supervisors, getting the support and respect of your team members, getting the
work done through them and keeping them motivated is a big challenge. You can
enforce rules, read out instructions or give lectures on the way you expect
your colleagues and juniors to behave. However, the best way to manage and lead
is by setting an example. You can never extract good behavior by setting a bad
example.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">I have observed
two kinds of behaviour at work. I have worked with someone who was punctual,
polite and diligent. He completed all his work on time, stayed calm, highly
organized and was always ready to help. When there was a problem, he focused on
finding the solution rather than finding out the person to blame for the
problem. He treated everyone including the lowest level of employee with
respect. I have also worked with someone who was tardy, rude and indolent. She
never met the deadlines, was impetuous and disorganized and rarely available
for help. When a problem arose she focused on finding the person to blame
rather than finding the solution. Besides the slackness in work, she was
dominating and disrespectful with other staffs.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">What difference
does the behaviour make? Well, it is clearly a case of Professional v/s
Unprofessional. If you’re behaving in a professional way then your colleagues
and team members will respect you and follow you. However, if you’re behaving
unprofessionally then you’ll have almost no support from your team members.
Even when you make a good decision, it will be viewed with an eye of doubt. Even
though your colleagues put up a smile in front of you for the sake of social
convention, behind the back they will not have even a shred of respect for you.
While a professional behaviour will be praised and rewarded, an unprofessional behaviour
including the person who exhibits this kind of behaviour will be ridiculed and
someday penalized. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">As Spider Man
says, “<b>Big position demands bigger
responsibilities.”</b> It’s very easy misuse a high level position. You can
order people around and make them do your work. The ones below you may follow
orders out of obligation but will never be ready to help you willingly. To be a
responsible person and a good manager or a supervisor also means being a good
trend-setter. Example is the best advice you can give. Therefore, before you
begin to enforce rules, voice out lectures or read out instructions, you need
to make sure that you’re yourself setting a good example for others to follow.</span></div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-36121431020634410842012-01-22T16:46:00.001+05:302012-01-22T16:59:44.805+05:30Pros and Cons of Part-time Work<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<table align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKRmNrHIiHTY3VFr24LjsiWztyiQKFvSu-4g7TcsqmSwuyJmeS41AzNA4xDm1DkmKPxYrEEmBt2F6nar-SqR1sDGpMihiN87g1ZZ9qu9uvgyer7LkGtsB5DYgNrhgePZ3zePVXoqlZPR-1/s1600/CJohnstonPartTimeWorkL.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKRmNrHIiHTY3VFr24LjsiWztyiQKFvSu-4g7TcsqmSwuyJmeS41AzNA4xDm1DkmKPxYrEEmBt2F6nar-SqR1sDGpMihiN87g1ZZ9qu9uvgyer7LkGtsB5DYgNrhgePZ3zePVXoqlZPR-1/s200/CJohnstonPartTimeWorkL.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>Image Source: www.eurekastreet.com.au</i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
I worked full-time at four different places for almost 1.5 years. (Full-time in each of them - 1 month in a bank, 9 months in an INGO, 3 months for an individual and 5 months for an NGO.) Currently, I'm working part-time in four different places - all at the same time. Recently a colleague had asked me,<i> "Isn't full-time better than part-time?"</i> Well, the truth is - it isn't a matter of one being better than the other. It's a matter of preference. Thus, in this post, I'll be highlighting the benefits and drawbacks of working part-time based on my personal experience.</div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b>Benefits of working part-time</b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<b><br /></b></div>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<ol>
<li><b>Flexibility: </b>The best part of working part-time is the flexibility. You don't have to work the traditional 9-5. You have the discretion to choose when you want to work and when you don't. There is no fixed routine anymore. Every day you'll be doing something different.</li>
<li><b>Optimum utilization of time:</b> When you're working full-time you need to stay inside the office even in those days when you have no work. But, when you're working part-time, you can use that time in doing something else instead. Your time is used well.
</li>
<li><b>Chance to pursue your hobbies:</b> Since you have added flexibility and more time, you have a chance to pursue your hobbies. In my case, I spend a lot of time reading, writing and watching movies. The time saved can be used to change your hobbies into your skills and strengths.</li>
<li><b>Benefit of variety. </b>If you're following the same kind of routine every day and doing the same kind of work day in-day out, you're more likely to get dull and bored. When you work part-time, you'll be enjoying the advantage of variety as you'll be more keen, active and dynamic.</li>
<li><b>Higher earning: </b>Full-time job might give you additional benefits in the form of medical benefits and bonuses. However, if you compare the earning in terms of time you spend in a job then you're most likely earning more by working part-time.</li>
<li><b>More contacts:</b> Since you'll be working in more place than one, you're likely to have more contacts. You never know when these contacts will be a form of help for you.</li>
<li><b>Development of multiple skills: </b>If the jobs you're engaged in are of diverse nature then you get a chance to develop a variety of skills. On the other hand, working only in one position might limit your use of skills.</li>
<li><b>Potential for full-time employment: </b>Sometimes an organization can have a vacancy only for a part-time position. However, being associated in some ways to a big organization might increase your chances for working full-time in the same organization at some later date. The chances may be because the vacancy is advertised only internally or because your part-time experience has made you more knowledgeable of the work you'll be doing.</li>
<li><b>Determining the best option: </b>We don't always know what kind of job we wish to do or what kind of organization we'd prefer to work in. Working part-time gives you a chance to explore your option and later choose the one that you love the most and suits you the best.</li>
<li><b>Minding your own business.</b> The best advantage of working part-time I've found is that you get a chance to mind your own business. When you work full-time then you're most likely to be affected by the behavior of your team members and colleagues. But, when you work part-time, you go to the workplace, do your work and stay indifferent to other's behaviors. </li>
</ol>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Drawbacks of working part-time</b></div>
<div>
<ol>
<li><b>No additional benefits:</b> In terms of payment, part-time staffs don't get all the benefits that full-time employees get. Furthermore, they may also miss out on training and development opportunities.</li>
<li><b>Unstable earnings: </b>When you're working part-time there might be a season when there's no work while some seasons you may be working to the max. Thus, earnings end up being unstable.</li>
<li><b>A sense of non-belonging: </b>When you're working part-time, you don't fully belong to an organization. You won't be a part of internal meetings and you may not even be invited for office dinners and programs. This might make you feel a little left-out. </li>
<li><b>Jack of all, master of none:</b> If you're engaged in jobs that differ widely in nature then you might end up being a jack of all but master of none. Instead if you're devoting full-time to a particular kind of job then you're more likely to be an expert in that area.</li>
<li><b>Stagnant growth.</b> When you work full-time then you progress along the organizational hierarchy as your performance improves and higher level position opens up. But, working part-time might mean stagnancy in terms of career growth.</li>
</ol>
<div>
Whether you choose to work part-time or full-time depends a lot on your personality, preference and life situations. For the time being, I prefer working part-time because I'm in the phase of exploring options and developing skills rather than settling down, I'm also earning more this way and this gives me freedom in terms of time. I get a chance to work on my personal projects. This priority might change some day and your priority might be different than mine. All you need to know is there is no barometer that indicates one kind of job to be better than the other. Generally part-timers are not considered as highly as full-timers. For ages the society has been valuing 'getting a job that pays you fixed paychecks each month'. But, it's totally a matter of choice in terms of what you wish to pursue and you have the freedom to choose what suits you the best.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-75021804123652994492012-01-18T10:05:00.000+05:302012-01-18T10:05:47.966+05:30Focusing on the Product<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right; margin-left: 1em; text-align: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiRxVMhoBWNht5P0l4skGy19WagYQacUJpFd6_jg8tPzWOwIHAhwJ6JvShDTH4O37dYuHeO7v45auaIhZIl3eUELuumEGaqvAS2qeIJYAXSNRyL_mkbM2NlT06z4qyX5n6a7xKXPafL-U6/s1600/delicious.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjiRxVMhoBWNht5P0l4skGy19WagYQacUJpFd6_jg8tPzWOwIHAhwJ6JvShDTH4O37dYuHeO7v45auaIhZIl3eUELuumEGaqvAS2qeIJYAXSNRyL_mkbM2NlT06z4qyX5n6a7xKXPafL-U6/s200/delicious.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #a64d79; font-size: small;">Really? For how long?</span><br /><i>Image Source: 123rf.com</i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">The Marketing
Mix composes of 4 Ps – Product, Price, Place and Promotion. Out of the four Ps,
in my last post, I discussed about how companies rely on cheap promotion like
the senseless use of sex appeal to promote their product. In this post, I want
to focus on the first P, i.e. the Product and let me limit my discussion to
food companies.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">When I was a child, there was a Nepali brand of biscuits that used to be very fresh, delicious and crispy. Now I prefer Indian biscuits because that Nepali brand has lost its
original taste as well as quality. Their taste is either slightly musty or each
piece of biscuit in the packet have dark edges making the biscuits taste
bitter. I’ve experienced the same problem with a certain chocolate brand. When
it was launched at first it was as good as Kit-Kat. You could purchase the
taste of a Rs. 10 chocolate-covered wafer for Rs. 5. When I tasted the same chocolate-covered
wafer a few years later, I was disappointed. This reminds me of the
ever-increasing brand of noodles. The old noodle brands have diversified their
product in terms of the offering in taste. Sadly, the product seems to have lost
its original taste. The same holds true for bakery products. When the company
is new then everything is so fresh and yummy. A year or two later, the product
loses its quality. You begin to find pieces of egg-shells in fruit cakes and
the cookies start to grow darker and bitter. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">I haven’t been
in those production factories or bakery kitchens to identify the exact reason
for these kinds of changes in taste and quality over the years (or months, in some cases). However, based
on conjecture there must be four reasons why these problems occur. First, the
raw material that is being used for making the product may have deteriorated in
terms of quality. Second, the quality standards might not be
set. If they are set, then they are either not being followed or the quality
testing methods and equipments are not available. And, if the quality monitoring
methods and equipments are available and the standards are being followed then
the standards set may not be very precise. For example, what colour should the
biscuits manufactured be? Is it okay if every biscuit produced is burned to
black at the edges? Third, the production machine might not have been repaired
and maintained on a regular basis. It is obvious that if the input and
processing device is out of order then the output cannot be what is expected.
Fourth and the most important – these food production companies may have been
too focused on pricing, promotion and distribution that the core product
received no attention. No one really remembered to preserve the originality in
taste and quality of these products. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHiiiGpEsYgE5dvlJX55RM83bvgrqEpYJxx66rYGZwrZfvXYPLrNuiT4hAGng6o5bgd3ZsWQ9WZIbRI1Irf0N31eCslFHvcTctg-Hr_uxjX3e9m4EDv9qLQdVK_aMSfcgHLaIRtQY0cpr4/s1600/healhty.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjHiiiGpEsYgE5dvlJX55RM83bvgrqEpYJxx66rYGZwrZfvXYPLrNuiT4hAGng6o5bgd3ZsWQ9WZIbRI1Irf0N31eCslFHvcTctg-Hr_uxjX3e9m4EDv9qLQdVK_aMSfcgHLaIRtQY0cpr4/s200/healhty.jpg" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: red; font-size: small;">Is it?</span><br /><i>Image Source: 123rf.com</i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">As a consumer, I’ll
try a new kind of food product if someone has told me it’s good. Otherwise, I
may rely on the packaging to make that first decision. After the first taste, I’ll
go back to the supermarket and buy the same food item again only if I like the
taste. If at any point of time the product disappoints me then I’ll stop
purchasing that product as long as there are other options available in the
market. (I recently did that with one brand of cake that turned from being soft
and sweet to hard and extra-sweet.) No one has a commitment towards any
product. As soon as the companies decide to switch away from their originality
and degrade their quality then there will be a group of conscious customers who
will decide to switch away from the company’s offerings. At the end, it is the
one who serves the best product on a consistent basis that earns loyal
customers in the long-run.</span></div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2030493101949461637.post-81900698543050471442012-01-15T14:28:00.000+05:302012-01-15T14:37:05.976+05:30Senseless use of Sex Appeal<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJx4X8G441AlDrA5xUPgMkFiyyNfJZdZUxOAMVOxJc9OnUc1At6LsIH8WC5tMSiaQx3Ez_4A6WrQepM2n-oVO0ZUC7aUO1iPUO_iKIi3sRR91YSxDJcITWwDfV0uJba4VyP_VL0lrJaP9N/s1600/sexy-legs-vector+%25282%2529.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJx4X8G441AlDrA5xUPgMkFiyyNfJZdZUxOAMVOxJc9OnUc1At6LsIH8WC5tMSiaQx3Ez_4A6WrQepM2n-oVO0ZUC7aUO1iPUO_iKIi3sRR91YSxDJcITWwDfV0uJba4VyP_VL0lrJaP9N/s200/sexy-legs-vector+%25282%2529.jpg" width="190" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><i>Image Source: vertorstock.com</i></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<span lang="EN-GB">On my journey
back home along the roads of Golkhupakha to Gongabu there is a hoarding board
of an advertisement above one of the roadside shops. In the ad, there are three
girls in skimpy clothing. Whether they are the same girl or different ones, I couldn’t
tell from a distance. And, then I wonder if it is perhaps the advertisement of
a boutique or a clothes showroom that sells summer clothes for uptown girls
throughout the season. As I take a closer look and scan at the wider length of
the board, I see the name of a certain carpet at the bottom right corner of the
advert. The funny thing is I never notice the carpet in the picture. (Not that
I wouldn’t but because I couldn’t!) The only things I notice are her boots that
is delightfully stepping on the carpet and her seductive pose.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">In yet another
advert, I can see a Nepali actress wearing a low-neck t-shirt
exposing the dent in her cleavage, lying uncomfortably across a sofa and holding a phone by her ears. And,
since t-shirt seems to be the only thing she’s wearing I can’t help but notice
her clearly waxed legs in high heels. And then when I read the text that accompanies the picture I
tell myself, “Ah! This is supposed to be some phone company and not the
announcement of Nepal Fashion Week.”</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">I even saw a big
picture of another Nepali actress beside the advert of an alcohol. I kept
wondering what the hoarding board represented when it showed half the board
with the face of a pretty girl smudged in make-up and the other half with a
bottle of rum. Was the board trying to say “pretty girls drink” or “when you
drink you become pretty”? Or was it trying to say “if you drink then pretty
girls will admire you” or “you should drink because pretty girl says so”? I’m
totally at a loss to comprehend!</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">Using sex appeal
and pretty girls to promote a product is not wrong or uncommon. In fact, sex
appeal serves the best purpose in the promotion of certain kind of products.
Take for example, body spray, body lotion or hair removing creams. An ordinary
guy that everyone ignores suddenly becomes the centre of attention of girls
because he puts on a certain body spray. In fact, his neighbour is ready to
cheat on her husband because of the aromatic pleasure she derives in his
presence. It is completely fine and logical to show a girl exposing her thighs
if she’s advertising a body lotion or a hair removing cream. Her smooth and
gentle legs are the living proof of the effectiveness of the lotion or cream. While
sex appeal is the underlying point of attracting the audience in these adverts,
the major focus is still on the product. The underdog found hot chicks and the
girl got her smooth legs due to the body spray and the body lotion respectively. When this
message is translated in print, then a cool guy surrounded by girls can be
holding the body spray and a girl can be resting her body next to a big image
of the lotion. In both these cases, the focus of the image should, of course,
be on the product and not the models!</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="tab-stops: 359.25pt; text-align: justify;">
<span lang="EN-GB">If the focus of the advertisers is on ‘sex’, then at least use some ‘sense’.
I wonder how many people bought the
carpet because they saw the girl in mini-skirt and high boots stepping on the
carpet! I also wonder if people switched to that particular phone company because
they showed a sexy Nepali actress using the same service. I chose their service
only because it gave cheaper call rates to call to the US. These models are, in
fact, taking away the focus from the product itself. Why not then focus on the chief utility and the competitive advantage of the product rather than exposing body parts of models that in no way adds any value to the product? I compare these adverts to
mindless comedies that aren’t just a disgrace for the models but also for the
product and services of the companies these models are posing for and the one
who gave that kind of idea for such senseless tactic of promotion.</span></div>
</div>Unknownnoreply@blogger.com0