
I've seen organizations operate in the following two extremes:
1. Has a set of strict policies but no room for the slightest flexibility.
2. Has no policies and thus operates in ambiguity.
The question is: "Which of the two is better?"
Buddhism talks about taking the middle road. Have nothing in extreme but everything in moderation. Thus, following the Buddhist philosophy and drawing from my own experiences, I can tell you for sure that neither of the two is better. While it's important for an organization to have it's set of policies, there also needs to be room for some flexibility. Therefore, the wise and efficient way is to take the middle road.
An organization operating only...